Google AdWords Specialists

Thomas Creek Concepts

Google AdWords Specialists header image 2

Splitting Blue AdWords Hairs: The Top Positions

November 19th, 2006 · 3 Comments

For some time I had been wrestling with this excerpt from the Google AdWords help material.

“Keyword-targeted ads are ranked on search result pages based on their maximum cost-per-click (CPC) and the keyword’s Quality Score on Google.com. (For the top positions above Google search results, we use the actual CPC.)”

The word actual bothered me.

I remembered the old, very straight forward, formula for Ad Rank; AR = Max Bid x CTR (clickthorugh rate), which gave way to the current standard formula: AR = Max Bid x Quality Score. Even though the formulaic details of Quality Score are veiled in secrecy, I understand and have embraced the basic Quality Score concept, and the current standard ad rank formula itself is straight forward enough. But when Google started talking about this other calculation for the top-blue spots, using the actual CPC, I started getting a little perplexed.

The way it was worded, I was thinking there was a separate calculation for ads appearing in the top-blue spots above the organic search listings. A separate calculation not only for position but also for the actual cost of the click. Since the top positions were important to a number of my clients I was determined to get as much clarity a possible.

After a number of rounds of emails and phone calls, over several months, I was still not satisfied. None of the explanations dealt with the elusive phrase “we use the actual CPC”. I just didn’t understand how the actual cost of a click could be used to determine position, prior to the click actually occurring. Thinking the actual CPC was being substituted for the Max Bid in calculating ad rank for the top-blue spots.

Thanks to an explanation from Ge****n (privacy respected) in Agency Support, I think I finally understand, or at least am temporarily satisfied with the delusion that I understand, Ad Rank when it comes to the top-blue positions.

Here was the a-ha moment for me.

The calculation is the same, but then additional filters – at least three anyway- are applied to determine which ads are ELIGIBLE for top-blue spots. And one of those filters is a minimum monetary requirement for the calculated cost of the potential click – ie “the actual cost” of the click. Another filter being a minimum Quality Score. We do not know what these minimums are of course. And in addition to these minimum thresholds the ads must be approved, as they are for content and site targeting.

This explanation lifted the fog; the formulas for calculating Ad Rank and Cost-per-Click were not different for the top-blue spots at all. But once those are calculated, then eligibility for the top-blue spots is determined by some application of minimum Quality Score and/or calculated CPC (the actual cost, if clicked).

There isn’t a huge strategic application now that I have split this annoying blue hair.
Relevancy still rules.

But now I can worry some other bone that only a wonk like me would think needs gnawing.
Sometimes though, the difference between profit and loss is in such obscure details.

-T

Tags: AdWords Quality Score · For Wonks Only

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Michael // Mar 7, 2007 at 3:58 am

    I am astonished by this completely new language. I just encountered the “Adwords Basics” and looked at some questions and ended up on your site.
    Do you know how to DO this (placing adverts that work)? because I am finding this information baffling. I’m In Australia. I’d be delighted to receive a bit of help on how to create a successful (and cheap - or is that an oxymoron) advert on line.

  • 2 tchale // Mar 7, 2007 at 7:40 am

    Hi Michael,

    I am rushing around on my way to an all day conference. I will comment a little further when I get a chance.

    -T

  • 3 tchale // Mar 8, 2007 at 2:00 pm

    Finally, a chance to comment a little further.

    Just a note though.
    SearchFest 2007 was well worth it even if the work did pile up while I was there.

    I’ll guarantee you Michael. I heard some “astonishing” things myself while I was there. The world of Internet and Search marketing is accelerating at a rapid pace.

    As far as knowing how to do this stuff and/or make it work. I do.

    I have been involved in Internet Promotion for about 7 years, have been using AdWords for over 3 years, have been an AdWords Qualified Professional since about as long as the program has been in effect and have been making my living solely as an AdWords Manager and Consultant for about 2 years.

    Some of my clients are more successful than others, a few I do not succeed with at all. In the end if my client does not have a good product, service, or cause, as well as an at least adequate website, nothing I can do is going to be successful.

    On the other hand if all they need is to get in front of their target market in a cost effective way. AdWords and I can be very effective.

    As far as helping you Michael. I’m for hire! Although I am getting much more selective about projects I accept based on the criteria above.

    When I do have time for “pro bono” work, I lend a hand answering questions in the AdWords Help Google Groups.

    -T

Leave a Comment